On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 8:13 AM Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org> wrote:
> If we're checking xmin and find that it is invalid (i.e. 0) just
> report that as corruption, similar to what's already done in the
> three cases that seem correct. If we're checking xmax and find
> that's invalid, that's fine: it just means that the tuple hasn't
> been updated or deleted.
What about aborted speculative insertions? See
heap_abort_speculative(), which directly sets the speculatively
inserted heap tuple's xmin to InvalidTransactionId/zero.
It probably does make sense to keep something close to this check --
it just needs to account for speculative insertions to avoid false
positive reports of corruption. We could perform cross-checks against
a tuple whose xmin is InvalidTransactionId/zero to verify that it
really is from an aborted speculative insertion, to the extent that
that's possible. For example, such a tuple can't be a heap-only tuple,
and it can't have any xmax value other than InvalidTransactionId/zero.
--
Peter Geoghegan