Re: proposal - psql - possibility to redirect only tabular output

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: proposal - psql - possibility to redirect only tabular output
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRDeT9YBCNMXhC8GFC6cdOukDsz24oGzNUtFsU0HEM0dOQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: proposal - psql - possibility to redirect only tabular output  (Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>)
Ответы Re: proposal - psql - possibility to redirect only tabular output  (Artur Zakirov <zaartur@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


so 11. 4. 2020 v 11:04 odesílatel Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> napsal:
On 2020-04-11 10:21, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> so 11. 4. 2020 v 8:54 odesílatel Pavel Stehule
> <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
> napsal:

> [psql-status-target.patch]

Hi Pavel,

This looks interesting, and I built an instance with the patch to try
it, but I can't figure out how to use it.

Can you perhaps give a few or even just one example?

Main motivation for this patch is working with psql for writing and editing queries, and browsing result in second terminal with pspg or any other similar tool (tail, ...). The advantage of this setup is possibility to see sql and query result together. I use terminal multiplicator (Tilix), but it can be used without it.

So example with pspg (should be some fresh release)

1. create fifo used for communication - mkfifo ~/pipe

2. run in one terminal pspg - pspg -f ~/pipe --hold-stream=2

3. run psql in other terminal

psql
\o ~/pipe
CREATE TABLE foo(a int);
INSERT INTO foo VALUES(10);
-- in default case, the status row "CREATE", "INSERT" is redirected to "browser terminal" and it doesn't look well (and it is not user friendly).

with patched version you can

\set STATUS_TARGET stdout
-- after this setting, the status row will be displayed in psql terminal

Regards

Pavel





thanks!

Erik Rijkers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Erik Rijkers
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal - psql - possibility to redirect only tabular output
Следующее
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Index Skip Scan