Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Corey Huinker
Тема Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution
Дата
Msg-id CADkLM=eHssZhc2tC4t6C=8uGn2LV=NE6LuzavZc3+=mFW0AC0A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
9e43e87

Patch fails on current master, but correctly applies to 9e43e87. Thanks for including the commit id.

Regression tests pass.

As with my last attempt at reviewing this patch, I'm confused about what kind of queries can take advantage of this patch. Is it only cases where a local table has multiple inherited foreign table children? Will it work with queries where two foreign tables are referenced and combined with a UNION ALL?

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Should we eliminate or reduce HUP from docs?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading postmaster's log messages about bind/listen errors