Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZWGknJzYE9NX0WPAPW=TNNkJa6BjMTWy_Mdfke==mDvA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera escribió:
>
>> Okay, here's a patch along these lines.  I haven't considered Jim's
>> suggestion downthread about discounting dead tuples from relpages; maybe
>> we can do that by subtracting the pages attributed to dead ones,
>> estimating via tuple density (reltuples/relpages).
>
> Patch attached.

This strikes me as too clever by half.  You've introduced the concept
of a "Browne strength" (apparently named for Christopher Browne) and
yet you haven't even bothered to add a comment explaining the meaning
of the term, let along justifying the choice of that formula rather
than any other.  I don't want to dog this proposal to death, because
surely we can do better than the status quo here, but adopting the
first formula someone proposed without any analysis of whether it does
the right thing cannot possibly be the correct decision process.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables