Re: Non-superuser subscription owners

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Non-superuser subscription owners
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYriYevhHQXKqew=a1_NHnz5n5AR8izLwrWcEJs0fQRXw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Non-superuser subscription owners  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 1:26 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > If I'm asked to attempt to connect to a PostgreSQL server, and I
> > choose to do that, and the connection succeeds, all I know is that the
> > connection actually succeeded.
>
> Well, there is PQconnectionUsedPassword()... Not that it's a great answer.

Sure, but that's making an inference about why the remote side did
what it did. It's not fantastic to have a security model that relies
on connecting to a server chosen by the user and having it tell us
truthfully whether or not it relied on the password. Granted, it won't
lie unless it's been hacked, and we're trying to protect it, not
ourselves, so the only thing that happens if it does lie is that it
gets hacked a second time, so I guess there's no real vulnerability?
But I feel like we'd be on far sounder footing if we our security
policy were based on deciding what we are willing to do (are we
willing to read that file? are we willing to attempt that
authentication method?) and before we actually do it, rather than on
trying to decide after-the-fact whether what we did is OK based on
what the remote side tells us about how things turned out.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jacob Champion
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Authentication fails for md5 connections if ~/.postgresql/postgresql.{crt and key} exist
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner