On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 7:51 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On 2023-Dec-07, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>
> > Hm, this set doesn't apply for me. 0003 gives error, see below (sorrty for
> > my interspersed bash echoing - seemed best to leave it in.
> > (I'm using patch; should be all right, no? Am I doing it wrong?)
>
> There's definitely something wrong with the patch file; that binary file
> should not be there. OTOH clearly if we ever start including binary
> files in our tree, `patch` is no longer going to cut it. Maybe we won't
> ever do that, though.
>
> There's also a complaint about whitespace.
Looks like I messed something up when using git (rebase -i). :-(
Apply-able patches attached, including fixes based on jian he's comments.
--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com