Re: changed behavior in libpq odbc driver
От | Anoop Kumar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: changed behavior in libpq odbc driver |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B4AF8C04F762D246A1E38EC5DFAEFC0B0379C9@blrmail2.aus.pervasive.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | changed behavior in libpq odbc driver ("Scot Loach" <sloach@sandvine.com>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
Hi All, Here is a patch for the following bug pointed out by Scot. "SQLGetConnectAttr with SQL_ATTR_CONNECTION_DEAD doesn't seem to work anymore." I request you to review this patch. Regards Anoop > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@vale-housing.co.uk] > Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 2:16 PM > To: Anoop Kumar; dpage@vale-housing.co.uk; sloach@sandvine.com > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > Subject: RE: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver > > Thanks :-) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Anoop Kumar"<anoopk@pervasive-postgres.com> > Sent: 25/08/05 06:56:58 > To: "Dave Page"<dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>, "Scot > Loach"<sloach@sandvine.com> > Cc: "pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org"<pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org> > Subject: RE: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver > > Hi Dave, > > OK, I shall look into the state code problem and dead connection > detection issues. :-) > > Regards > > Anoop > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@vale-housing.co.uk] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:16 PM > > To: Anoop Kumar; Scot Loach > > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > > Subject: RE: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org > > > [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Anoop Kumar > > > Sent: 24 August 2005 07:17 > > > To: Scot Loach > > > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > > > Subject: Re: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have committed the patch for returning SQL_NO_DATA_FOUND instead > of > > > SQL_SUCCESS when no rows got affected in UPDATE/DELETE. You > > > may check it > > > out from the CVS. > > > > Ahh, one less item on my todo :-) > > > > Do you intend to fix the state code problem and dead connection > > detection issues reported by Scot as well? > > > > <sob story>it would really help me if you could as I've got a bunch of > > other stuff to do :-( </sob story> > > > > :-) > > > > Regards, Dave. > > > > -----Unmodified Original Message----- > Hi Dave, > > OK, I shall look into the state code problem and dead connection > detection issues. :-) > > Regards > > Anoop > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@vale-housing.co.uk] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:16 PM > > To: Anoop Kumar; Scot Loach > > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > > Subject: RE: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org > > > [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Anoop Kumar > > > Sent: 24 August 2005 07:17 > > > To: Scot Loach > > > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > > > Subject: Re: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have committed the patch for returning SQL_NO_DATA_FOUND instead > of > > > SQL_SUCCESS when no rows got affected in UPDATE/DELETE. You > > > may check it > > > out from the CVS. > > > > Ahh, one less item on my todo :-) > > > > Do you intend to fix the state code problem and dead connection > > detection issues reported by Scot as well? > > > > <sob story>it would really help me if you could as I've got a bunch of > > other stuff to do :-( </sob story> > > > > :-) > > > > Regards, Dave.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: