Forgot to include the group...
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Gokulakannan Somasundaram
<gokul007@gmail.com> wrote:
These sound like the same point to me. I don't think we're concerned
with footprint -- only with how much of that footprint actually needs
to be scanned. So if we have a solution allowing the scan to only need
to look at the index then the extra footprint of the table doesn't
cost anything at run-time. And the visibility map is very small.
Yep.. They are one and the same...
Just wanted a clarification on the design goals going forward.
Thanks,
Gokul.