Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> I'm going to disable the URL patch, since it doesn't seem to work and
> breaks legitimate uses of database names with funny characters. The
> service patch seemed kind of useful, but since it's not documented and I
> don't feel like finding out, I think we can let it go the SSL way, i.e.,
> sort out for next release.
Sounds like a plan. The service patch at least doesn't look like it
will cause surprises for anyone who doesn't know about it ...
regards, tom lane