Re: Patch for ALTER TABLE / TYPE

NAKANO Yoshihisa <nakano.yosihisa@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> After looking at the test case a bit, I have an alternate approach:
>> constraints on the column will have DEPENDENCY_AUTO type, while
>> constraints using the column will have DEPENDENCY_NORMAL type.

> O.K.  It seems nicer than my solution.

> Please find the patch attached.  I fixed the patch to decide the order
> of the list by deptype of the pg_depend record.

Patch applied with some minor comment improvements.  Thanks!

            regards, tom lane