Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck
Дата
Msg-id 71576b32-f9bc-fdbd-782f-af5f0dc9f84c@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck  (Neha Khatri <nehakhatri5@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2/14/17 16:50, Jeff Janes wrote:
> make installcheck currently fails against a server running
> with bytea_output = escape.
> 
> Making it succeed is fairly easy, and I think it is worth doing.
> 
> Attached are two options for doing that.  One overrides bytea_output
> locally where-ever needed, and the other overrides it for the entire
> 'regression' database.

I would use option 2 here (ALTER DATABASE) and be done with it.  Some
people didn't like using ALTER DATABASE, but it's consistent with
existing use.  If someone wants to change that, that can be independent
of this issue.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Other formats in pset like markdown, rst, mediawiki
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] on_dsm_detach() callback and parallel tuplesort BufFile resource management