On 9/2/14 4:15 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> I don't like rebranding the PERFORM command, as that would require all
> existing code with PERFORM commands to be changed.
I'm not saying the suggested syntax is perfect, but PERFORM should be
euthanized anyway. Or at least the need for it; perhaps there's no need
to break all the current uses of PERFORM.
.marko