Re: Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
John R Pierce
Тема
Re: Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets?
Дата
Msg-id
53F293A4.5070704@hogranch.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets? Ken Tanzer <ken.tanzer@gmail.com>
Re: Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets? John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>
Re: Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets? Matt S <matt@eatsleeprepeat.net>
Re: Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets? Ken Tanzer <ken.tanzer@gmail.com>
Re: Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets? John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>
Re: Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets? Ken Tanzer <ken.tanzer@gmail.com>
Re: Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets? John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>
Re: Localhost vs. Unix Domain Sockets? Matt S <matt@eatsleeprepeat.net>
On 8/18/2014 4:55 PM, Ken Tanzer wrote:
> So I've got two questions.  One is whether there are any downsides to 
> using sockets, or any "gotchas" to be aware of.  The second is whether 
> there is anything to do to increase the security of sockets?  (e.g., 
> analagous to encrypting localhost conenctions with SSL?)  From the 
> little I saw, it sounds like sockets are "just inherently secure," but 
> wanted to confirm that or get another opinion!

localhost is plenty secure, only root can sniff it, and root can su to 
postgres and be in full ownership of your server anyways, so if you 
consider root a security risk, well, there's no cure for that.

unix domain sockets are quite secure too.   they might be slightly 
faster than tcp/ip via localhost, but its probably not enough to matter.



-- 
john r pierce                                      37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Ken Tanzer
Дата:
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
FAQ