Ivan,
> Other things could have influenced your result - 260 MB/s vs 300 MB/s is
> close enough to be influenced by data position on (some of) the drives.
> (I'm not saying anything about the original question.)
You misread my post. It's *87mb/s* vs. 300mb/s. I kinda doubt that's
position on the drive.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com