Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
>> A message entitled "Having Fun With PostgreSQL" was posted to Bugtraq
>> today. I haven't read through the paper yet so I don't know if the
>> author discusses security problems that need attention or if the
>> article is more like a compilation of "Stupid PostgreSQL Tricks."
>> http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/471541/30/0/threaded
>
> It appears he's discovered the astonishing facts that
>
> 1. The out-of-the-box authentication setup is "trust".
> 2. A superuser can make the database do whatever he wants (within
> the OS privilege limits of the postgres user).
>
> We've debated #1 before, and a lot of repackagers change it, but I
> don't really feel a strong urge to change it in the source distro.
> As for #2, that's not a bug, it's intended behavior.
On #1, the fact that we allow trust as default is embarrassing. It would
be just as bad as having the default root password be password on a
linux box. We should be using md5 and force passing the password with
initdb.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> PS: I skimmed the paper pretty fast, so it's possible I missed
> something interesting, but it sure looked like "what else is new?"
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/