Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>:
>
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
>>>> Bill Moran wrote:
>>>>> Instructions are in the mail headers of each message:
>>>> Actually it is quite ridiculous that we expect someone to read the mail
>>>> headers.
>
> I don't find it so. That's like saying it's ridiculous to expect the
> average auto owner to change the oil every 3000 miles. Reading headers
Uhh... no. A better analogy would be:
expecting an average postgresql user to vacuum
Which is completely different then expecting the average user to have a
clue or care what an email header is. Email headers are part of the
source code of email, not part of the usage to users (man that sounds
weird).
> isn't a terribly esoteric thing to do. I taught an "intro to email" class
> back in 2000 and spent about 5 minutes explaining headers and what they
> meant. The students didn't have any difficulty grasping the concept, and
> I got the impression that they found the information enlightening.
All due respect, but you are the 2% of the 98%. Not a common user,
frankly no common DBA should ever have to read email headers, ever. That
is what an systems administrator is for (sometimes, yes they are one and
the same).
>> Our lists (the @postgresql.org ones) are the only lists to which I
>> subscribe that do not put the unsubscribe info at the bottom of every
>> email sent to the list.
>
> I guess that makes RFC2369 another great idea that nobody's paying attention
> to ...
>
> shame ...
Now that I won't disagree with but then again, when was the last time
you say a compliant web browser? ;)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/