Re: Best Procedural Language?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: Best Procedural Language?
Дата
Msg-id 44D0C6CB.9060401@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Best Procedural Language?  ("Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>)
Список pgsql-general
Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
>> plPHP is not as mature as plTcl (or is that plTclng). However it is very
>> well developed and maintained. Heck, companies are even holding talks and
>> training classes on it now.
>
> What is lacking in plPHP? To be honest, even though I am a Tcl developer I
> would rather develop in PHP, and I know next to NOTHING about PHP!

There are some known issues that cause it to crash, you can see the
project site for an example.

Also it requires the apache apxs stuff which doesn't make it the most
portable.

We are looking at ways to make it not have the apache requirement.

Joshua D. Drake


--

    === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
    Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
              http://www.commandprompt.com/



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Best Procedural Language?
Следующее
От: Kenneth Downs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Best Procedural Language?