Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Дата
Msg-id 44947.68.143.134.146.1135790639.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane said:
> I wrote:
>> So the mere act of defining a plperl function, even with
>> check_function_bodies = false, is sufficient to send control through
>> that bit of libperl code that does setlocale(LC_ALL, "").  Ugh.
>> This is much worse than I thought.
>
> It seems one ingredient in this is that the plperl function validator
> fails to honor check_function_bodies, and hence is calling libperl
> anyway.  I wonder if that explains the sudden rise in incidents in 8.1?
>

That's probably because I was unaware of its existence.

It should certainly be fixed, but surely at best this would only delay
seeing the ugly locale effect - as soon as you call a perl function you'll
be back in the same boat regardless.

cheers

andrew




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)