Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies
От
Thomas Hallgren
Тема
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies
Дата
Msg-id
42316AB2.3060903@mailblocks.com
Ответ на
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies (Laszlo Hornyak)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Laszlo Hornyak <kocka@forgeahead.hu>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Laszlo Hornyak <kocka@forgeahead.hu>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Laszlo Hornyak <kocka@forgeahead.hu>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Laszlo Hornyak wrote: >The default should be the default used by PostgreSQL, and the extra ones >should be commented out under it. >Not the most user friendly solution, but can we do anything else? > > Yes, we can do as I suggested and select mapping depending on the GUC variable "integer_datetimes". I guess you have some initial handshake between the postgresql backend and the JVM where you can negotiate things like that? Regards, Thomas Hallgren
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата: