Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Thomas Hallgren
Тема
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies
Дата
Msg-id
42316AB2.3060903@mailblocks.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Laszlo Hornyak <kocka@forgeahead.hu>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Laszlo Hornyak <kocka@forgeahead.hu>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Laszlo Hornyak <kocka@forgeahead.hu>
Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Laszlo Hornyak wrote:

>The default should be the default used by PostgreSQL, and the extra ones
>should be commented out under it.
>Not the most user friendly solution, but can we do anything else?
>  
>
Yes, we can do as I suggested and select mapping depending on the GUC 
variable "integer_datetimes". I guess you have some initial handshake 
between the postgresql backend and the JVM where you can negotiate 
things like that?

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
FAQ