Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters above 0x10000
От
Oliver Jowett
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters above 0x10000
Дата
Msg-id
41157069.1080508@opencloud.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 "John Hansen" <john@geeknet.com.au>
Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org>
Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>
Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>
Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters above 0x10000 Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org>
Tom Lane wrote: > If I understood what I was reading, this would take several things: > * Remove the "special UTF-8 check" in pg_verifymbstr; > * Extend pg_utf2wchar_with_len and pg_utf_mblen to handle the 4-byte case; > * Set maxmblen to 4 in the pg_wchar_table[] entry for UTF-8. > > Are there any other places that would have to change? Would this break > anything? The testing aspect is what's bothering me at the moment. Does this change what client_encoding = UNICODE might produce? The JDBC driver will need some tweaking to handle this -- Java uses UTF-16 internally and I think some supplementary character (?) scheme for values above 0xffff as of JDK 1.5. -O
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления