Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently

On 14.11.23 19:21, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> I did not say that occurrences of "ISO 8601" should be replaced with
> "RFC 3339".  Just that the docs should have a cautionary note about the
> SQL standard using a subset of ISO 8601 and that Postgres does not
> implement (at the moment) all of its date formats.

The SQL standard does not refer to ISO 8601 to define date formats, it 
has its own definitions.  In fact, PostgreSQL implements more date 
formats than the SQL standard requires.