Re: Correlation in cost_index()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Manfred Koizar
Тема Re: Correlation in cost_index()
Дата
Msg-id 3mpnpuccoukikseed1e3pedo5t1dfj64cn@4ax.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Correlation in cost_index()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 02 Oct 2002 18:48:49 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
wrote:
>I don't think it's really a good idea to expect users to pick among
>multiple cost functions

The idea is that PG is shipped with a default representing the best of
our knowledge and users are not encouraged to change it.  When a user
sends a "PG does not use my index" or "Why doesn't it scan
sequentially?" message to one of the support lists, we advise her/him
to set index_cost_algorithm to 3 (or whatever we feel appropriate) and
watch the feedback we get.

We don't risk anything, if the default is the current behaviour.

ServusManfred


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Lamar Owen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: v7.2.3 - tag'd, packaged ... need it checked ...
Следующее
От: Manfred Koizar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Correlation in cost_index()