On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:57, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Obviously there's something there for the kernel guys to fix, but
> even with a non-borked kernel it's an expensive thing to do.
Any thoughts on back patching this? While its not a bug per-say, it
seems reasonably low-risk. I for one would love a 2-4x initdb speedup
in the back branches :) Granted now I know I can just set TZ...