I wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
>> I think this caused anole to say:
>> "reloptions.c", line 1362: error #2042: operand types are incompatible
>> ("void" and "int")
>> errdetail_internal("%s", _(optenum->detailmsg)) : 0));
> Yeah, I was just looking at that :-(
> We could revert the change to have these functions return void,
> or we could run around and change the places with this usage
> pattern to use "(void) 0" instead of just "0". The latter would
> be somewhat painful if only minority compilers warn, though.
> Also, I don't think that having to change ereport usage was part
> of the agreed-to plan here ... so I'm leaning to the former.
Done that way.
regards, tom lane