Re: [HACKERS] new return value of PQfsize

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] new return value of PQfsize
Дата
Msg-id 28265.905349942@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на new return value of PQfsize  (Edmund Mergl <E.Mergl@bawue.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Edmund Mergl <E.Mergl@bawue.de> writes:
> the libpq-function PQfsize() now returns int instead of
> short. It looks like, that this needs some adaption in the
> backend, because now the size of a variable length field is
> returned as 65535 instead of -1.

Oops.  That's libpq's bug, not the backend's.

I thought that the rearrangement of libpq's interface
would be a good time to hide the fact that field sizes are
currently restricted to short --- which was visible in the
return type of PQfsize, and nowhere else in libpq's API.

But I guess I forgot to ensure that sign extension would happen
correctly :-(.  Will fix.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Edmund Mergl
Дата:
Сообщение: new return value of PQfsize
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems...