Re: BUG #3731: ash table "PROCLOCK hash" corrupted

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: BUG #3731: ash table "PROCLOCK hash" corrupted
Дата
Msg-id 27516.1194542988@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на BUG #3731: ash table "PROCLOCK hash" corrupted  ("Daniel Cristian Cruz" <cruz@senai-sc.ind.br>)
Ответы Re: BUG #3731: ash table "PROCLOCK hash" corrupted  (Daniel Cristian Cruz <cruz@senai-sc.ind.br>)
Список pgsql-bugs
"Daniel Cristian Cruz" <cruz@senai-sc.ind.br> writes:
> A few moments ago I got the following message, but didn't found any
> reference on the internet (including lists).

> Nov  8 13:50:56 SERVER postgres[18874]: [5-1] user=XXX,db=XXXPANIC:  hash
> table "PROCLOCK hash" corrupted

> The error showed after some query that where logged because were slow (more
> than 5 seconds), in which they had a very big list of values in a NOT IN
> clause (not sure if this caused the problem).

> I don't know if this is a bug or not.

Well, it shouldn't have happened, so either it's a bug or you had a
hardware glitch.  But unless you can find a way to reproduce it I'm
not sure we can do much about it.  I doubt your large NOT IN was
relevant --- more likely it'd be something associated with inter-process
interactions.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #3730: Creating a swedish dictionary fails
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Planner problems in 8.2.4 and 8.2.5 (was: Possible planner bug/regression introduced in 8.2.5)