Hi,
On 2023-11-02 10:46:52 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> So it sounds like we're in agreement that it is time to require LLVM
> 10+ in master. Could the owners (CC'd) of the following animals
> please turn off --with-llvm on master (and future 17+ branches), or
> consider upgrading to a modern OS release? Otherwise they'll turn
> red.
>
> And of course Andres would need to do the same for his coverage
> animals in that range:
>
> animal | arch | llvm_version | os | os_release
> | end_of_support
> -------------+--------------------+--------------+--------+------------+----------------
> dragonet | x86_64 | 3.9.1 | Debian | sid |
> phycodurus | x86_64 | 3.9.1 | Debian | sid |
> desmoxytes | x86_64 | 4.0.1 | Debian | sid |
> petalura | x86_64 | 4.0.1 | Debian | sid |
> idiacanthus | x86_64 | 5.0.2 | Debian | sid |
> pogona | x86_64 | 5.0.2 | Debian | sid |
> komodoensis | x86_64 | 6.0.1 | Debian | sid |
> xenodermus | x86_64 | 6.0.1 | Debian | sid |
Would you want me to do this now or just before you apply the patch?
I think I should stand up a few more replacement animals to cover older llvm
versions with assertions enabled...
Greetings,
Andres Freund