On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 09:45:40PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 9:20 PM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks. Do we need a similar wakeup approach for logical replication
>> workers in worker.c? Or is it okay that the nap time is 1sec there?
>
> Yeah, I think so. At least for its idle/nap case (waiting for flush
> is also a technically interesting case, but harder, and applies to
> non-idle systems so the polling is a little less offensive).
Bharath, are you planning to pick this up? If not, I can probably spend
some time on it.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com