* Andrew Dunstan (andrew@dunslane.net) wrote:
> On 05/18/2015 08:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >andres@anarazel.de (Andres Freund) writes:
> >>On 2015-05-19 00:08:05 +0000, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>>Note: for lack of a suitable testing environment, I've not really exercised
> >>>this change. I trust the buildfarm will show up any mistakes.
> >>Shouldn't src/test/modules/dummy_seclabel/ exercise this without further
> >>dependencies?
> >I have no idea how thoroughly that tests it --- I was assuming we'd need
> >to see a run from contrib/sepgsql to be sure it's OK.
>
> The buildfarm has no support for contrib/sepgsql
Right, that's on my list of things to address, though I'm not
particularly worried about the changes being made.
I expect we'll have some additional changes to sepgsql to discuss for
9.6, once we're ready to discuss such.
Thanks!
Stephen