Paul Ramsey wrote:
> Did the FAA ever publish slides of those talks? Sure wish I could see them... :)
No, sorry, I don't think I ever saw the slides published.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> P.
>
> On 2010-08-11, at 6:58 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>
> > Greg Smith wrote:
> >> Greg Williamson wrote:
> >>> Our tests -- very much oriented at postGIS found Oracle to be between 5
> >>> and 15% _faster_ depending on the specifics of the task. We decided to go
> >>> with postgres given the price difference (several hundred thousand dollars for
> >>> Oracle in the configuration we needed vs. zip for postgres -- we already had
> >>> trained postgres DBAs).
> >>>
> >>
> >> Can always throw the licensing savings toward larger hardware too; $100K
> >> buys a pretty big server nowadays. At the FAA's talk about their
> >> internal deployment of PostgreSQL:
> >> https://www.postgresqlconference.org/2010/east/talks/faa_airports_gis_and_postgresql
> >>
> >> They were reporting that some of their difficult queries were
> >> dramatically faster on PostgreSQL; I vaguely recall one of them was 100X
> >> the speed it ran under Oracle Spatial. It was crazy. As always this
> >> sort of thing is very workload dependent. There are certainly queries
> >> (such as some of the ones from the TPC-H that big DB vendors optimize
> >> for) that can be 100X faster on Oracle too.
> >
> > The FAA reported something like that at PG East about Oracle vs.
> > Postgres performance with GIS data.
> >
> > --
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
> > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
> >
> > + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
> >
> > --
> > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
> > To make changes to your subscription:
> > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +