Tom Lane wrote:
> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> > *) csv is supposed to be CRLF *always*. We do not do this. We do
> > however read different types of newlines. So we are a 4180 reader but
> > not an emitter. Not so sure if I think changing this is a good idea
> > though without exposing a knob.
>
> Given the lack of field complaints, I think changing this would be a
> pretty terrible idea; much more likely to break things than fix them.
> It's not like that RFC has huge recognition as The Standard.
Should we document we support the standard?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com