Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable
Дата
Msg-id 200801311513.m0VFDoR24185@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
Ответы Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hi,
> 
> Le jeudi 31 janvier 2008, Tom Lane a ?crit?:
> > We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server
> > version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard
> > error, rather than something people could override with -i.
> 
> Are you thinking about next major or minor version ? All the same?
> Is there some real good reason not to dump say 8.2.6 server with the pg_dump 
> from an 8.2.5 installation?

They are talking about cross-major dumps, 8.2 pg_dump dumping an 8.3
database.  They are saying that should be disallowed.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remove pg_dump -i option (was Re: Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable)