Re: Simple thing to make pg_autovacuum more useful

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > All this thread is a waste of time.  We've previously agreed that we're
> > going to store autovacuum per-table settings in pg_class.reloptions.
> 
> I had forgotten that discussion.  So the plan is for the pg_autovacuum
> catalog to go away entirely, correct?

Yup.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support