-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:11:42 -0500
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> That would surely defeat the whole point of having this. We want to
> have the same syntax as PL/SQL, not different syntax for the same
> things.
I'm sorry I thought we were developing PostgreSQL.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHj4RlATb/zqfZUUQRAmidAKCsRmGkQezCs+KqXOQ860V9g4jDnwCgkIKS
9qdY+ULKlRMucvxideWzjQE=
=REm+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----