Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > The fact is, the existing system worked as it should, though it is often
> > invisible. We didn't get all the features we wanted, but that isn't
> > because the system isn't working.
>
> Well that kind of comes back to my point of better communication.
> Perhaps a lot of this discussion could have been avoided if the TODO had
> been more... proactive?
>
> For example:
>
> Make postmater and postgres options distinct so the postmaster -o
> option is no longer needed | PeterE | Confirmed for 8.2 | 07/20/06
We could do that, but once an item is done I don't see the point in
having the date and person's name. You are right that is clearly a
different purpose from the TODO list, and if someone wants to track
that, it might help things.
-- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +