On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:12:32AM -0700, Robert Creager wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> I goofed with the patch I submitted last year for adding 'week' capability to
> the date_trunc function.
>
> Attached is a patch against HEAD for your review.
It has this comment in it: /* the new year cannot be greater than the
* original year, so we subtract one if it is
Can you please explain that?
The "iso" year can be both greater and smaller than the current
year.
Kurt