On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 04:47:45PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The IPv6 patch seems to still be a few bricks shy of a load. Grepping
> for places that handle AF_INET but not AF_INET6 revealed these
> unimplemented features:
>
> 1. IDENT authorization. Fails if either local or remote address is IPv6.
I've actually written this already.
> 2. SSL. Postmaster allows SSL for AF_INET but not AF_INET6.
Hmm, it really shouldn't matter if it uses AF_INET or AF_INET6
... I should look into that.
> 3. Client address display in backend's ps display seems to be v4 only.
I'll take a look at that too.
> 4. pgstat code can only bind to 127.0.0.1 (v4 loopback). On a v6-only
> machine this would not exist, would it?
I'm not sure, but I think I changed something about that. Can
you point me to that code?
Kurt