On 6/2/17 22:13, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 5/27/17 06:54, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> On 27/05/17 04:00, Euler Taveira wrote:
>>> 2017-05-26 21:29 GMT-03:00 Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com
>>> <mailto:petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>>:
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually another possibility would be to remove the REFRESH keyword
>>> completely and just have [ WITH (...) ] and have the refresh option
>>> there, ie simplified version of what you have suggested (without the
>>> ugliness of specifying refresh twice to disable).
>>>
>>>
>>> It will cause confusion. It seems that WITH sets ALTER SUBSCRIPTION
>>> properties. Indeed, they are REFRESH properties. I think we shouldn't
>>> exclude REFRESH keyword. Syntax leaves no doubt that WITH are REFRESH
>>> properties.
>>>
>>
>> Maybe, I don't know, it might not be that confusing when SET PUBLICATION
>> and REFRESH PUBLICATION have same set of WITH options.
>
> I'm not sure what the conclusion from the above discussion was supposed
> to be, but here is a patch.
committed
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services