Re: Further cleanup of pg_dump/pg_restore item selection code

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Further cleanup of pg_dump/pg_restore item selection code
Дата
Msg-id 14524.1516899779@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Further cleanup of pg_dump/pg_restore item selection code  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> Should pg_restore fail if asked to --create without a database entry in the
> TOC?

Yeah, I wondered about that too.  This patch makes it a non-issue for
archives created with v11 or later pg_dump, but there's still a hazard
if you're restoring from an archive made by an older pg_dump.  Is it
worth putting in logic to catch that?

Given the lack of field complaints, I felt fixing it going forward is
sufficient, but there's room to argue differently.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Arthur Zakirov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] [POC] Faster processing at Gather node