Re: DISTINCT to get distinct *substrings*?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: DISTINCT to get distinct *substrings*?
Дата
Msg-id 12848.1155068972@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: DISTINCT to get distinct *substrings*?  (Christoph Pingel <ch.pingel@web.de>)
Список pgsql-general
Christoph Pingel <ch.pingel@web.de> writes:
> Am 08.08.2006 um 19:49 schrieb Nikolay Samokhvalov:
>> don't use "DISTINCT ON" at all, it's evil :-) (why?
>> http://chernowiki.ru/index.php?node=38#A13

> Thanks for the good advice! From reading this, it seems to be a
> *really* bad thing. And I didn't get it from the official
> documentation. :-)

That page is complaining about DISTINCT ON as it was defined in 1999.
It's a lot harder to shoot yourself in the foot now:

regression=# select distinct on (ten) hundred from tenk1 order by unique2;
ERROR:  SELECT DISTINCT ON expressions must match initial ORDER BY expressions

I don't deny that it's nonstandard and pretty ugly, but sometimes it's
just really hard to solve a problem any other way.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: restoring a backup, incompatible with server
Следующее
От: John DeSoi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: read only transaction, temporary tables