On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 10:48 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > I understand the annoyance, but I think we do need to have an organized
> > way to do testing of non-ASCII data and in particular UTF8 data, because
> > there are an increasing number of special code paths for those.
>
> Well, if you want to keep the test, we should put in the variant with
> \200, because it is now clear that that is in fact the right answer
> in a nontrivial number of environments (arguably *more* cases than
> in which "\u0080" is correct).
I put in a new variant file. Let's see if it works.