On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:17 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-02-25 at 22:56 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> >
> >>> Since it's going to take us two weeks to clean up the other loose ends
> >>> anyway, there's no harm in letting Simon and Heikki try to complete the
> >>> patch by then. But I'll happily lay a side bet with you about what the
> >>> situation will be two weeks from now.
> >> I think Tom wins this bet, since it's now been four weeks. In fact,
> >> he was being optimistic: the loose ends aren't cleaned up either
> >> (based on a review of the wiki, we're about half way there: six
> >> patches have been committed in the intervening time and seven remain
> >> in the queue).
> >
> > I agree. It is time to move on.
>
> Huh? What features are you saying about to be moved on?
> Is it the updatable-view feature? or rest of all pending ones?
Tom originally stated (as I recall, no flames please) that we would wait
for 2 weeks for the hot standby stuff. It has now been four. That is
what I and I believe Robert Haas are talking about.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Thanks,
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 -
http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997