Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements
Дата
Msg-id 1200427883.4266.1777.camel@ebony.site
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 14:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Hunt" <kevin@centropy.com> writes:
> > The description of %p is misleading since it is replaced with not just the
> > path, but also filename.
>
> Hm?  "Path name" includes the file name in all usages I know about.

Agreed.

> > An example showing how the sample commands would be expanded would also
> > help:
>
> That sounds reasonable.

Yep, I'll scan the docs and submit a patch, unless Tom has already.

--
  Simon Riggs
  2ndQuadrant  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements