Re: Multi DB performance test

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: Multi DB performance test
Дата
Msg-id 1173799678.12681.1.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Multi DB performance test  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 23:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Tadej Kanizar" <Tadej.Kanizar@sagit-server.com> writes:
> > http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/
> > Any comments?
>
> Old news, see this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-02/msg00806.php
>
> Most of us stopped reading about the place where they explained
> that (a) they did zero tuning on each database, and (b) they were
> comparing myisam to transactional engines.
>
> It's amazing how many people do not understand that database performance
> testing is actually a pretty hard problem in itself --- simplistic tests
> will almost never show you the real-world bottlenecks.

While I still agree that the tests are overly simple, and don't really
give a good feel for a real world database, I just want to point out
that they have updated their testing and results to now include innodb
and berkely table types for mysql.

Sadly, they still do no transactions, they just compare single statement
innodb / berkely to myisam.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: insert rule instead oddity
Следующее
От: "Olivier Ceulemans"
Дата:
Сообщение: More information on how to understand table pg_locks.