Re: Trigger question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Trigger question
Дата
Msg-id 11294.975345620@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Trigger question  (Nelio Alves Pereira Filho <nelio@ifx.com.br>)
Список pgsql-general
Nelio Alves Pereira Filho <nelio@ifx.com.br> writes:
> To accomplish all that, first I need
> to unset some values, so I decided to use the BEFORE trigger to unset
> these values, and the AFTER trigger to do this calculation.

Why don't you just do all the work in the BEFORE trigger?

> And what's the real purpose of the AFTER trigger?

The sequence of events is

    compute contents of tuple to insert/update (per the query)

    apply BEFORE triggers

    check constraints

    insert tuple

    apply AFTER triggers

You *must* use a BEFORE trigger if you want to alter the tuple
that was computed by the query.  The point of an AFTER trigger
is that it won't be run until constraints have been passed,
so you can avoid doing potentially expensive work until you know
the tuple is good.  You might use an AFTER trigger to propagate
changes into other tables, for example.  But you can't change
the tuple.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug? 'psql -l' in pg_ctl?
Следующее
От: "Nick Fankhauser"
Дата:
Сообщение: How to keep Postgres from thrashing for a long time using "LIMIT" (or is there a better way?)!