Re: Possible bug in plpgsql/src/gram.y

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Possible bug in plpgsql/src/gram.y
Дата
Msg-id 10786.994905613@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Possible bug in plpgsql/src/gram.y  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Possible bug in plpgsql/src/gram.y
Re: Possible bug in plpgsql/src/gram.y
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Also, can someone tell my why we use malloc in plpgsql?

Plain palloc() won't do because the compiled tree for the function needs
to outlive the current query.  However, malloc() is not cool.  Really,
these structures ought to be built in a memory context created specially
for each function --- then it'd be possible to reclaim the memory if the
function is deleted or we realize we need to invalidate its compiled
tree.

I've had this in mind to do for awhile, but haven't gotten to it.
Do you want to put it on TODO?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Strangeness in xid allocation / snapshot setup
Следующее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: iconv?