Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Дата
Msg-id 10278.1438785168@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Wasn't the point that 32 bit AIX as a whole hasn't been supported for a
> couple years now? My willingness to expend effort for that is rather
> limited.

Well, there's one in the buildfarm.  We don't generally turn off
buildfarm critters just because the underlying OS is out of support
(the population would be quite a bit lower if we did).

> I mean I'd otherwise ok with a PG_FORCE_DISABLE_INLINE flag that takes
> effect in c.h or so. That could easily be set in src/template/aix. Might
> also be useful for investigatory purposes every couple years or so.

+1, that could have other use-cases.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6