On 1. of April 2018 17:46:38 MESZ wrote Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>:
>I assume this is a patch that's intended to be applied on top of the
>previous patch? If so, please submit the complete pach to make sure the
>correct combination ends up actually being reviewed.
The v02.patch attached to my last mail contains both source and documentation changes.
>Keeping patches as short as possible is not a good thing itself. The
>important part is that the resulting code and documentation is the best
>possible. Sometimes you might want to turn it into two patches
>submitted at
>the same time if one is clearly just reorganisation, but avoiding code
>restructure just to keep the lines of patch down is not helpful.
I think I've made the right compromises regarding readability of the documentation in my patch then.
A happy Easter, passover, or Sunday to you
Julian