Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Konstantin Knizhnik
Тема Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Дата
Msg-id 0498c45c-53cb-d9b0-c1e2-7d2d1a618511@postgrespro.ru
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables  ("曾文旌(义从)" <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>)
Ответы Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Список pgsql-hackers

On 06.01.2020 8:04, 曾文旌(义从) wrote:
> In the previous communication
>
> 1 we agreed on the general direction
> 1.1 gtt use local (private) buffer
> 1.2 no replica access in first version
>
> 2 We feel that gtt needs to maintain statistics, but there is no agreement on what it will be done.
>
> 3 Still no one commented on GTT's transaction information processing, they include
> 3.1 Should gtt's frozenxid need to be care?
> 3.2 gtt’s clog clean
> 3.3 How to deal with "too old" gtt data
>
> I suggest we discuss further, reach an agreement, and merge the two patches to one.
>

I also hope that we should come to the common solution for GTT.
If we do not try to address parallel execution issues and access to temp 
tables at replicas (and I agreed
that it should be avoided in first version of the patch), then GTT patch 
becomes quite small.

The most complex and challenged task is to support GTT for all kind of 
indexes. Unfortunately I can not proposed some good universal solution 
for it.
Just patching all existed indexes implementation seems to be the only 
choice.

Statistic is another important case.
But once again I do not completely understand why we want to address all 
this issues with statistic in first version of the patch? It contradicts 
to the idea to make this patch as small as possible.
Also it seems to me that everybody agreed that users very rarely create 
indexes for temp tables and explicitly analyze them.
So I think GTT will be useful even with limited support of statistic. In 
my version statistics for GTT is provided by pushing correspondent 
information to backend's cache for pg_statistic table.
Also I provided pg_temp_statistic view for inspecting it by users. The 
idea to make pg_statistic a view which combines statistic of normal and 
temporary tables is overkill from my point of view.

I do not understand why do we need to maintain hash with some extra 
information for GTT in backends memory (as it was done in Wenjing patch).
Also idea to use create extension for accessing this information seems 
to be dubious.

-- 
Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional:http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mahendra Singh Thalor
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Questions/Observations related to Gist vacuum
Следующее
От: Sergei Kornilov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum