Re: Server misconfiguration???

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Andy
Тема
Re: Server misconfiguration???
Дата
Msg-id
001201c5cda7$4314b430$0b00a8c0@forge
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Server misconfiguration??? "Andy" <frum@ar-sd.net>
Re: Server misconfiguration??? Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
When I ment memory allocation, I look with htop to see the process list, CPU 
load, memory, swap. So I didn't ment the a postgre process uses that amount 
of memory.

I read some tuning things, I made the things that are written there, but I 
think that there improvements can be made.

regards,
Andy.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Lane" 
To: "Andy" 
Cc: 
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Server misconfiguration???


> "Andy"  writes:
>> I get the feeling the server is somehow missconfigured or it does not
>> work at full parameter. If I look at memory allocation, it never goes
>> over 250MB whatever I do with the database.
>
> That is not wrong.  Postgres expects the kernel to be doing disk
> caching, so the amount of memory that's effectively being used for
> database work includes not only what is shown as belonging to the
> PG processes, but some portion of the kernel disk buffers as well.
> You don't really *want* the processes eating all of available RAM.
>
> I concur with Chris K-L's comments that you should reduce rather
> than increase your settings.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> 

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Server misconfiguration???
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
FAQ