Re: Server misconfiguration???
От
Andy
Тема
Re: Server misconfiguration???
Дата
Msg-id
001201c5cda7$4314b430$0b00a8c0@forge
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Server misconfiguration??? "Andy" <frum@ar-sd.net>
Re: Server misconfiguration??? Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
When I ment memory allocation, I look with htop to see the process list, CPU load, memory, swap. So I didn't ment the a postgre process uses that amount of memory. I read some tuning things, I made the things that are written there, but I think that there improvements can be made. regards, Andy. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" To: "Andy" Cc: Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:18 PM Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Server misconfiguration??? > "Andy" writes: >> I get the feeling the server is somehow missconfigured or it does not >> work at full parameter. If I look at memory allocation, it never goes >> over 250MB whatever I do with the database. > > That is not wrong. Postgres expects the kernel to be doing disk > caching, so the amount of memory that's effectively being used for > database work includes not only what is shown as belonging to the > PG processes, but some portion of the kernel disk buffers as well. > You don't really *want* the processes eating all of available RAM. > > I concur with Chris K-L's comments that you should reduce rather > than increase your settings. > > regards, tom lane > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления